Amazon Institute Khairpur Mir's

Bill Green Bill Green

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

2V0-13.24 Latest Test Question - 2V0-13.24 Latest Real Exam

As you know, many exam and tests depend on the skills as well as knowledge, our 2V0-13.24 study materials are perfectly and exclusively devised for the exam and can satisfy your demands both. There are free demos of our 2V0-13.24 exam questions for your reference with brief catalogue and outlines in them. You can free download the demos of our 2V0-13.24 learning prep on the website to check the content and displays easily by just clicking on them.

The pass rate is 98.75%, and we can ensure you pass the exam successfully if you buying 2V0-13.24 exam braindumps from us. Most candidates can pass the exam just one time. And we ensure you that if you can’t pass the exam, you just need to send us the failure scanned, we will refund your money. We can ensure you that your money can receive rewards. In addition, we have three versions for 2V0-13.24 Training Materials, and you can buy the most suitable in accordance with your own needs.

>> 2V0-13.24 Latest Test Question <<

2V0-13.24 Latest Real Exam | Cheap 2V0-13.24 Dumps

There is no need to worry about virus on buying electronic products. For BraindumpStudy have created an absolutely safe environment and our exam question are free of virus attack. We make endless efforts to assess and evaluate our 2V0-13.24 exam question’ reliability for a long time and put forward a guaranteed purchasing scheme. If there is any doubt about it, professional personnel will handle this at first time, and you can also have their remotely online guidance to install and use our 2V0-13.24 Test Torrent.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Sample Questions (Q44-Q49):

NEW QUESTION # 44
Which of the following are key elements to consider when developing a risk mitigation strategy?
(Choose two)
Response:

A. Reducing system costs by ignoring certain risks.
B. Developing a plan to address risks before they affect the project.
C. Including risk management strategies only after the project begins.
D. Identifying potential risks that could impact the system.

Answer: B,D

NEW QUESTION # 45
The following design decisions were made relating to storage design:
* A storage policy that would support failure of a single fault domain being the server rack
* Two vSAN OSA disk groups per host each consisting of four 4TB Samsung SSD capacity drives
* Two vSAN OSA disk groups per host each consisting of a single 300GB Intel NVMe cache drive
* Encryption at rest capable disk drives
* Dual 10Gb or faster storage network adapters
Which two design decisions would an architect include within the physical design? (Choose two.)

A. Encryption at rest capable disk drives
B. A storage policy that would support failure of a single fault domain being the server rack
C. Dual 10Gb or faster storage network adapters
D. Two vSAN OSA disk groups per host each consisting of four 4TB Samsung SSD capacity drives
E. Two vSAN OSA disk groups per host each consisting of a single 300GB Intel NVMe cache drive

Answer: C,D

NEW QUESTION # 46
The following storage design decisions were made:
DD01: A storage policy that supports failure of a single fault domain being the server rack.
DD02: Each host will have two vSAN OSA disk groups, each with four 4TB Samsung SSD capacity drives.
DD03: Each host will have two vSAN OSA disk groups, each with a single 300GB Intel NVMe cache drive.
DD04: Disk drives capable of encryption at rest.
DD05: Dual 10Gb or higher storage network adapters.
Which two design decisions would an architect include in the physical design? (Choose two.)

A. DD03
B. DD02
C. DD05
D. DD04
E. DD01

Answer: A,B

Explanation:
In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, thephysical designspecifies tangible hardware and infrastructure choices, while logical design includes policies and configurations. The question focuses on vSAN Original Storage Architecture (OSA) in a VCF environment. Let's classify each decision:
Option A: DD01 - A storage policy that supports failure of a single fault domain being the server rack This is a logical design decision. Storage policies (e.g., vSAN FTT=1 with rack awareness) define data placement and fault tolerance, configured in software, not hardware. It's not part of the physical design.
Option B: DD02 - Each host will have two vSAN OSA disk groups, each with four 4TB Samsung SSD capacity drives This is correct. This specifies physical hardware-two disk groups per host with four 4TB SSDs each (capacity tier). In vSAN OSA, capacity drives are physical components, making this a physical design decision for VCF hosts.
Option C: DD03 - Each host will have two vSAN OSA disk groups, each with a single 300GB Intel NVMe cache drive This is correct. This details the cache tier-two disk groups per host with one 300GB NVMe drive each.
Cache drives are physical hardware in vSAN OSA, directly part of the physical design for performance and capacity sizing.
Option D: DD04 - Disk drives capable of encryption at rest
This is a hardware capability but not strictly a physical design decision in isolation. Encryption at rest (e.g., SEDs) is enabled via vSAN configuration and policy, blending physical (drive type) and logical(encryption enablement) aspects. In VCF, it's typically a requirement or constraint, not a standalone physical choice, making it less definitive here.
Option E: DD05 - Dual 10Gb or higher storage network adapters
This is a physical design decision (network adapters are hardware), but in VCF 5.2, storage traffic (vSAN) typically uses the same NICs as other traffic (e.g., management, vMotion) on a converged network. While valid, DD02 and DD03 are more specific to the storage subsystem's physical layout, taking precedence in this context.
Conclusion:The two design decisions for the physical design areDD02 (B)andDD03 (C). They specify the vSAN OSA disk group configuration-capacity and cache drives-directly shaping the physical infrastructure of the VCF hosts.
References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: vSAN OSA Design) VMware vSAN 7.0U3 Planning and Deployment Guide (integrated in VCF 5.2): Physical Design Considerations VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Storage Hardware)

NEW QUESTION # 47
A VMware Cloud Foundation multi-AZ (Availability Zone) design requires that:
All management components remain centralized.
The availability SLA must be no less than 99.99%.
Which two design decisions would help meet these requirements? (Choose two.)

A. Implement a stretched L2 VLAN for the infrastructure management components between the AZs.
B. Implement VMware Live Recovery between the selected AZs.
C. Select two distant AZs and configure separate management workload domains.
D. Implement separate VLANs for the infrastructure management components within each AZ.
E. Select two close proximity AZs and configure a stretched management workload domain.

Answer: B,E

Explanation:
The requirements specify centralized management components and a 99.99% availability SLA (allowing ~52 minutes of downtime per year) in a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2 multi-AZ design. In VCF, management components (e.g., SDDC Manager, vCenter, NSX Manager) are typically deployed in a Management Domain, and multi-AZ designs leverage availability zones for resilience. Let's evaluate each option:
Option A: Implement a stretched L2 VLAN for the infrastructure management components between the AZsA stretched L2 VLAN extends network segments across AZs, potentially supporting centralized management. However, it doesn't inherently ensure 99.99% availability without additional HA mechanisms (e.g., vSphere HA, NSX clustering). TheVCF 5.2 Architectural Guidenotes that L2 stretching alone lacks failover orchestration and may introduce latency or single points of failure if not paired with a stretched cluster, making it insufficient here.
Option B: Select two distant AZs and configure separate management workload domainsSeparate management workload domains in distant AZs decentralize management components (e.g., separate SDDC Managers, vCenters), violating the requirement for centralization. TheVCF 5.2 Administration Guidestates that multiple management domains increase complexity and don't inherently meet high availability SLAs without cross-site replication, ruling this out.
Option C: Implement VMware Live Recovery between the selected AZsVMware Live Recovery (part of VMware's DR portfolio, integrating Site Recovery Manager and vSphere Replication) provides disaster recovery across AZs. It ensures centralized management components (in one AZ) can fail over to a secondary AZ, maintaining an RTO/RPO that supports 99.99% availability when properly configured (e.g., <5-minute failover with replication). TheVCF 5.2 Architectural Guiderecommends Live Recovery for multi-AZ resilience while keeping management centralized, making it a strong fit.
Option D: Implement separate VLANs for the infrastructure management components within each AZ Separate VLANs per AZ enhance network isolation but imply distributed management components across AZs, contradicting the centralized requirement. Even if management is centralized in one AZ, separate VLANs don't directly improve availability to 99.99% without HA or DR mechanisms, per theVCF 5.2 Networking Guide.
Option E: Select two close proximity AZs and configure a stretched management workload domainA stretched management workload domain spans two close AZs (e.g., <10ms latency) using vSphere HA, vSAN stretched clusters, and NSX federation. This keeps management components centralized (single SDDC Manager, vCenter) while achieving 99.99% availability through synchronous replication and automatic failover. TheVCF 5.2 Architectural Guidehighlights stretched clusters as a best practice for multi-AZ designs, ensuring minimal downtime (e.g., seconds during host/AZ failure), meeting the SLA.
Conclusion:
C: VMware Live Recovery enables centralized management with DR failover, supporting 99.99% availability.
E: A stretched management domain in close AZs ensures centralized, highly available management with near- zero downtime.These decisions align with VCF 5.2 multi-AZ best practices.References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide(docs.vmware.com): Multi-AZ Design and Stretched Clusters.
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide(docs.vmware.com): Management Domain Resilience.
VMware Live Recovery Documentation(docs.vmware.com): DR for VCF Environments.

NEW QUESTION # 48
An architect is designing a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)-based private cloud solution for a customer that will include two physical locations. The customer has stated the following requirement:
All management tooling must be resilient at the component level within a single site.
When considering the design decisions for VMware Aria Suite components, what should the Architect document to meet the stated requirement?

A. The solution will implement an external load balancer for Aria Operations Cloud Proxies.
B. The solution will configure the VCF Workload domain in a stretched topology across two locations.
C. The solution will deploy Aria Suite Lifecycle Manager in a high availability configuration.
D. The solution will deploy three Aria Automation appliances in a clustered configuration.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The requirement specifies that management tooling must be resilient at the component level within a single site, meaning each site's management components (e.g., VMware Aria Suite) must withstand individual failures without relying on the other site. Let's evaluate each option in the context of VCF 5.2 and Aria Suite:
Option A: The solution will implement an external load balancer for Aria Operations Cloud Proxies Aria Operations Cloud Proxies collect data for monitoring and don't inherently require an external load balancer for resiliency within a site. TheVMware Aria Operations Administration Guideindicates that proxies are lightweight and typically deployed per cluster, with resiliency achieved via multiple proxies, not load balancing. This doesn't directly address component-level resiliency for the broader Aria Suite management tools.
Option B: The solution will configure the VCF Workload domain in a stretched topology across two locationsA stretched topology extends a workload domain across two sites for site-level resiliency (e.g., disaster recovery), not component-level resiliency within a single site. TheVCF 5.2 Architectural Guidenotes that stretched clusters rely on cross-site failover, which contradicts the requirement for single-site resilience, making this irrelevant to management tooling within one site.
Option C: The solution will deploy three Aria Automation appliances in a clustered configuration VMware Aria Automation (formerly vRealize Automation) supports a clustered deployment with three appliances (primary, replica, and failover) to ensure high availability within a site. TheVMware Aria Automation Installation Guideconfirms that this configuration provides component-level resiliency by allowing the cluster to tolerate individual appliance failures without service disruption. In VCF, Aria Automation is a key management tool, and this design meets the requirement for single-site resilience.
Option D: The solution will deploy Aria Suite Lifecycle Manager in a high availability configuration Aria Suite Lifecycle Manager (LCM) manages the lifecycle of Aria components but isn't deployed in a clustered HA configuration itself in VCF 5.2-it's a single appliance with backup/restore options. TheVCF
5.2 Administration Guidenotes that LCM resiliency is typically achieved via infrastructure HA (e.g., vSphere HA), not native clustering, making this less directly aligned with component-level resiliency compared to Aria Automation clustering.
Conclusion:Option C best meets the requirement by ensuring Aria Automation, a critical management tool, is resilient at the component level within a single site through clustering, aligning with VCF and Aria Suite best practices.References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide(docs.vmware.com): Management Component Design.
VMware Aria Automation Installation Guide(docs.vmware.com): Clustered Configuration for HA.
VMware Aria Suite Lifecycle Administration Guide(docs.vmware.com): LCM Deployment Options.

NEW QUESTION # 49
......

Good opportunities are always for those who prepare themselves well. You should update yourself when you are still young. Our 2V0-13.24 study materials might be a good choice for you. The contents of our study materials are the most suitable for busy people. You can have a quick revision of the 2V0-13.24 study materials in your spare time. Also, you can memorize the knowledge quickly. There almost have no troubles to your normal life. You can make use of your spare moment to study our 2V0-13.24 Study Materials. The results will become better with your constant exercises. Please have a brave attempt.

2V0-13.24 Latest Real Exam: https://www.braindumpstudy.com/2V0-13.24_braindumps.html

VMware 2V0-13.24 Latest Test Question Basically speaking, the longer time you prepare for the exam, the much better results you will get in the exams, Thanks to our customer's supports, our VMware 2V0-13.24 Latest Real Exam prep material can make such accomplishments, VMware 2V0-13.24 Latest Test Question Maybe you still cannot find a correct path that leads to success, VMware 2V0-13.24 Latest Test Question By practicing and remember the points in them, your review preparation will be highly effective and successful.

The interactive, multimedia geek in me loves all the features under Window 2V0-13.24 Latest Test Question > Interactivity, with Animation my ultimate favorite, We brought in Kate to play on Poppa's lap, desperate for some way to distract.

100% Pass 2V0-13.24 - High Pass-Rate VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Latest Test Question

Basically speaking, the longer time you prepare for the exam, the much 2V0-13.24 better results you will get in the exams, Thanks to our customer's supports, our VMware prep material can make such accomplishments.

Maybe you still cannot find a correct path that leads to success, 2V0-13.24 Latest Real Exam By practicing and remember the points in them, your review preparation will be highly effective and successful.

They got success in 2V0-13.24 exam with flying colors and did a job in top world companies.

Bill Green Bill Green

Biography

Pages

Services

Social Media